1 Introduction
Fig. 1. (b) All the constituent elements reported in HECs to date. (b) Total number of publications on major HECs over the last decade. Data was retrieved from Web of Science on February 28, 2025, using keywords: “high-entropy”, “oxide”, “boride”, “carbide”, “nitride”, “silicide”, “fluoride”, “hydride”, “phosphide”, “sulfide”, and “ceramics”. |
2 Concept and Features
3 Theoretical Design
3.1 Stability and Synthesizability
Fig. 2. (a) Pairwise correlations of computational parameters: atomic radius deviations, lattice parameters, stabilization factors for miscible binary carbides, and electrochemical factors on different scales (top); correlations between different electronegativity scales (bottom) [64]. (b) Atomic size difference and atomic mass difference vs. thermal conductivity (left) and thermal expansion coefficient (right) at 1100°C [67]. (c) DFT (Density Functional Theory)-computed formation energies of the six model cation arrangements relative to the DFT-derived ground-state cation arrangement (left); oxide compositions are sorted in descending order of the highest DFT-computed formation energy relative to the ground state (right) [60]. (d) Workflow of machine learning for HECs. [68]. |
Table 1. Parameters and Descriptors Related to Theoretical Design |
Symbol | Name | Definitional Formula | Physical Meaning | Ref | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ΔSmix | Mixed entropy | $\Delta S_{mix}=−R_{i}\sum c_{i}lnc_{i}$ | ci is the content of different components. | [71] | |
ΔHmix | Enthalpy of mixing | $ΔH_{mix}=E_{HEC}-\sum c_{i}E_{i}$ | The sum of the interaction energy differences in the ideal state. | [72] | |
Ω | Entropy-enthalpy balance factor | $Ω=\frac{T_{m}\Delta S_{mix}}{|\Delta H_{mix}|}$ | Tₘ is the isothermal temperature. | [73] | |
δ | Atomic (ion) radius difference | $δ=\sqrt{\sum_{i}c_{i}(1-\frac{r_{i}}{\overline{r}})^2}, \overline{r}=\sum_{i}c_{i}r_{i}$ | Contribution of differences in atomic/ionic radii of components to lattice distortion | [74] | |
Δχ | Electronegativity difference | $\Delta\chi =\sqrt{\sum_{i}c_{i}(\chi_{i}-\overline{\chi})^2}$, $\overline{\chi}=\sum_{i}c_{i}\chi_{i}$ | Δχ reflects the difference in electronegativity between different elements. | [75] | |
VEC | Valence electron concentration | $VEC=\sum_{i}(valence\quad electrons \quad of \quad i)$ | Reflects the degree of electron filling and energy band structure characteristics of the system | [74] | |
DEED | Disordered Enthalpy-Entropy Descriptor | $DEED=\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{\Omega}^{-1} [H_{f}]}{<\Delta H_{hull}>_\Omega}}$ | Predicting the possibility of single-phase disordered structures in multicomponent systems, Hf and Hfull are the DFT formation energies of the partial occupation POCC tiles and the convex hull, respectively. | [76] | |
EFA | Entropy forming ability | $EFA=(\sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}g_{i}(H_{i}-H_{mix})^2} {\sum_{i=1}^{n}g_{i}-1}})^{-1}$ | Entropy-driven formation of stable single-phase solid solutions, where n is the total number of sampled geometrical configurations and gi are their degeneracies. Hi of the sampled configurations. | [66] | |
LDI | lattice distortion index | $LDI=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sqrt{(x_{i,a}-x_{i,0})^{2}+(y_{i,a}-y_{i,0})^{2}+(z_{i,a}-z_{i,0})^{2}/n}$ | Parameters for the degree of lattice distortion in disordered systems, (x, y) is the atomic position. | [77] | |
The normalized geometric packing parameter for the metallic sublattice calculated | $\gamma =(1-\sqrt{1-\frac{(r_{s}+\overline{r})^{2}-\overline{r}^2}{(r_{s}+\overline{r})^2}})/(1-\sqrt{1-\frac{(r_{L}+\overline{r})^{2}-\overline{r}^2}{(r_{L}+\overline{r})^2}})$ | Evaluating how different metal atoms stack together in a crystal lattice, where rs and rL are the radii of the smallest and largest atoms. | [78] |
3.2 Properties Prediction
Fig. 3. (a) The 3D plots of the NET (neural network) training set were generated based on three parameters (bulk modulus, Young's modulus, and cohesive energy) [79]. (b) A plot of (iDOS(Epg, EF)) vs. VEC composed of nine solid solution high-entropy carbides shows that iDOS increases linearly along with VEC, and Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.99 [82]. (c) The stress-strain curves from the AIMD (Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics) tensile simulations of MEC and HEC [77]. (d) SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) visualization features importance ranking [84]. |
Fig. 4. (a) The fitting formation energy curve of (TiVNbTa)Cx with variation of anionic vacancy concentration; Curves of anionic carbon and vacancy fraction under changing carbon content [86]. (b) Average YSSs and ROM (rule of mixture) predictions for (HfTiZr)1-x (NbTa)xC (left); for each x/VEC (valence electron concentration) value, whether partial slip occurs when shearing along the [1 0](111) direction in five supercells with different atomic distributions (right) [89]. (c) Diffusion energy barriers for oxygen ions on the RE-RE edge (left) and on the RE-Ta and Ta-Ta edges (right), respectively, in RE3TaO7 [91]. |
4 Structures and Compositions
4.1 High-entropy Simple Oxides
Fig. 5. Typical crystal structures of high-entropy ceramics. Here, two color schemes are used to clarify the difference between simple and complex oxides, and 2×2×2 supercells for the three crystal structures at left side for better comparison. |
Table 2. Synthesis methods for high-entropy simple oxides corresponding product features. |
Composition | Preparation | Feature | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(MgCoNiCuZn)O | Pulsed Laser Deposition (PLD) | structural stability of rock-salt modulated by Mg, Ni, Co | [94] | |
Li(CrMnFeCoNiCu)O2 | single-phase layered rock-salt oxide films | [95] | ||
(CeZrLaSmNdY)O2-δ | Solid-state reaction | single-phase cubic fluorite structure | [96] | |
(YZHfCeX)O2-δ (X = La, Nd, Gd, and Dy) | uniformly distributed fluorite structure with good force thermal stability | [97] | ||
(ZrHfTiSn)O2 | Solid phase sintering | highly resistant to irradiation | [98] | |
RE2A2O7 (RE = [La, Sm, Nd, Gd. Dy, Yb, Y, Er, Eu, Tb, Ho, Lu, Tm], A = Zr,Hf,Ti,Sn,Ce or Pr) | RE2Ce2O7 and RE2Pr2O7 exhibit a single fluorite structure | [99] | ||
(ZrHfPrYLa)O2-δ | uniform fluorite structure | [100] | ||
(CuCoNiZnMg)O | Coordination Polymerization Solid Dispersant-Assisted Annealing | single-crystalline HEO rods with uniform dispersion | [101] | |
(BiZrMoWCeLa)O2 | Surfactantassisted hydrothermal technique | high electrochemical efficiency | [102] | |
(YLaNdSmYbLuEuGdCe)2O3 | Co-precipitation method combined with conventional sintering | bixbyite structure with high oxygen barrier properties | [103] | |
(5Re)2O3 (RE = Ce, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, and Yb) | Solution combustion synthesis method combined with conventional sintering | with cubic bixbyite-structured, and better oxygen barrier properties. | [104] | |
(EuErLuYYb)2O3, (SmErLuYYb)2O3, (SmEuErYYb)2O3, (SmEuLuYYb)2O3 | Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) | better CMAS resistance | [105] | |
(Y-La-Ce-Nd-Gd)2O3+β | Mechanochemical ball milling and sol-gel | the highest properties in the sol-gel process, followed by that in wet milling and dry milling | [106] |
Fig. 6. (a) X-ray diffractograms of four-component derivatives of (MgCoNiCuZn)O as a substrate; (b) DFT analysis of four diffractive phase compositions by mixing enthalpy [94]. (c) Side diagram of thin film battery with 50 nm Li(CrMnFeCoNiCu)O2 (001) as positive electrode, and cyclic voltammogram [95]. (d) CTE and Fracture toughness of HEO-La, Nd, Gd, Dy [97]. (e) the XRD patterns of the samples. It can be seen that RE2Zr2O7 and RE2Hf2O7 failed to form single-phase high-entropy pyrochlore phase; RE2Ce2O7 and RE2Pr2O7 HEOs, exhibited a single phase structure with a fluorite-type structure [99]. (f) Calculation of thermal conductivity of (EuErLuYYb)2O3, (SmErLuYYb)2O3 and Y2O3 [105]. (g) Thermal conductivity κ curve of HEO4, 5, 7-10 and Eu2O3 [104]. |
4.2 High-entropy Complex oxides
Table 3. Synthesis methods for high-entropy complex oxides corresponding product features. |
Composition | Preparation | Feature | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Pb(TiZrHfNbAl)-O Pb(TiZrHfNbCr)-O Pb (TiZrHfNbFe)-O Pb(TiZrHfNbMn)-O Pb(TiZrHfNbSc)-O (BiBaSrCaNa)Ti-O (BiBaSrCaK)Ti-O (BiBaSrNaPb)Ti-O | Solid-state reaction | show powdery HEOs and the perovskite phase formation is consistent with the Goldschmidt tolerance factor. | [115] |
(AlCoFeNiTi)3O4 | with anti-spinel structure | [116] | |
Ba(ZrTiSnHfX)O3 (X = Nb5+, Ta5+) | exhibits exceptional thermal stability within the range of 30 to 1400℃ | [117] | |
Ca5Sr5Ba5Pb5Nb2O6 | unfilled tetragonal tungsten bronze (TTB) structured | [118] | |
(REHoErYYb)3NbO7, (RE = Ce, Lu) (REHoErYYb)3NbO7: (REHoErYYb)NbO4 = 1:2 | the Ce-component samples showed superior corrosion resistance. | [119] | |
Ba0.4Sr0.6-xCaxNb2-xTaxO6 | exhibits TTB structure with significant dielectric properties | [120] | |
(YbLuTm)2Si2O7 (YbLuTmErHoDyGdSm)2Si2O7 (3-8HESi2O7) | High-throughput pressure-less sintering | excellent corrosion resistance at 1773 K | [121] |
(MnCoNiCuX)Fe2O4 (X=Fe, Mg) | Reactive flash sintering | a spinel crystal structure was obtained in just 30 min at 1173 K | [122] |
Sr(Ti2Zr2Hf3Mn0.15Sn0.18)O2.85 | Multimetallic polymeric precursors and photolithographic additive manufacturing | retain the printed geometry with high shape fidelity | [123] |
La(FeCuMnMgTi)O3 | Solid-state milling-heating method | displays robust stability in benzyl alcohol oxidation. | [124] |
(YbTmLuHoEr)2Ti2O7 | Floating-zone growth technique | monocrystalline pyrochlore structure | [125] |
(YGdDyErYb)2Hf2O7 | solution combustion | single phase fluorite structure with good TBC performance | [126] |
(Y5Yb5Er5Sc5)2Si2O7 | Sol-gel method | outstanding high temperature stability and CMAS corrosion resistance | [127] |
(YDyErTmYb)4Hf3O12 | ultrafast high-temperature sintering (UHS) | extremely sluggish grain growth characteristics and excellent high-temperature phase stability | [128] |
(YYbLuEuEr)3Al5O12 | Laser powder bed fusion | high-entropy phase with dendritic morphology | [129] |
Fig. 7. (a) Schematic diagram representation of the conversion of Li2O, LiF, and Li2CO3 during the cycling process of the preconditioned HEOs [112]. (b) Comparison of thermal properties at X = Ta, Nb [117]. (c) Effect of different configurational entropy (different x) on energy storage performance [120]. (d) Effect of the introduction of Zr4+ on the content of the pyrochlore phase (PY) and monoclinic phase (MPr) [137]. (e) Corrosion depths of different component HEREDs at 1673K, 60 h; time-dependent curves of corrosion depths of 5HERED vs. 7HERED at 1673K [121]. (f) Thermal conductivity, CTE, and Grüneisen parameters as a function of temperature [140]. |
4.3 High-entropy Non-oxides
Table 4. Synthesis methods for high-entropy non-oxides corresponding product features. |
Composition | Preparation | Feature | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
(HfZrTaNbTi)B2 (HfZrTaMoTi)B2 (HfZrMoMoNbTi)B2 (HfMoTaNbTi)B2 (HfZrTaNbTi)B2 | High-energy ball milling and spark plasma sintering | possess one solid-solution boride phase of the hexagonal AlB2 | [143] |
(Hf, Zr, Ta, Sm)B2 | Boron thermal reduction and hot press sintering | favorable oxidation resistance | [144] |
(Hf0.28Zr0.28Ta0.28RE0.16)B2 | Ultrafast-UHS and SPS | HEB2-Sc has the best resistance to oxidation | [145] |
(Ti0.2V0.2Nb0.2Ta0.2W0.2)Cx-10wt.%Ni (Ti0.2V0.2Nb0.2Ta0.2W0.1Mo0.1)Cx-10wt.% Ni | One-step in-situ carbo-thermal reduction and pressureless vacuum sintering | x = 0.75 - 0.85 range formed a stable two-phase HEC-Ni ceramic metal | [146] |
(TiZrNbTaCr)C | Carbothermal reduction reaction | Cr addition is beneficial to the oxidation resistance | [147] |
(Zr,Nb,Ta,Ti,W)C | Selective laser sintering (SLS) | showed enhanced hardness and reduced thermal conductivity, | [148] |
(CrNbTaMoW) C0.83 | Ultrafast Pressure Sintering (UPS) | dense single-phase and homogeneous structure in 3 min | [149] |
(Zr-Nb-Hf-Ta)C1-xNx | SPS | higher OOT compared to high entropy carbides and nitrides | [150] |
MAX-phase (TiZr0.6NbTa)2AlC | higher room and high temperature plasticity | [151] | |
(MoWCrTaNb)Si2 | micron-scale uniform C40 hexagonal structure | [152] | |
(MoNbTaTiZr)1-xNx | Hybrid direct current magnetron sputtering | x = 0 presents a BCC structure, x = 0.17 presents a FCC structure | [153] |
(Ti, Zr, Nb, Mo, Ta)C1-xNx | Open dynamic carbothermal reduction nitriding | HEC0.9N0.1 exhibits the highest mechanical properties | [154] |
K0.65Li0.07Mg0.19Mn0.17Co0.16Ni0.17Cu4F2.70 | Direct liquid-phase method | higher battery capacity | [155] |
(LaCePrNdSmEuGdDyHoErYbScY)OCl | In-situ core@shell@shell interdiffusion strategy | significant bandgap modulation effects | [156] |
4.3.1 High-entropy Carbides
Fig. 8. (a) Schematic diagram of ultra-fast pressure sintering apparatus [149]. (b) TEM cross-sections of the two samples sintered by SPS and SLS respectively, the sample with SPS has a uniform morphology and the sample sintered by SLS has a three-layer structure [148]. (c) XRD patterns of the samples oxidized for different durations, and Ti2(Nb, Ta)10O29 appeared at 4 h; The schematic diagram of the oxidation mechanism of (TiZrNbTaCr)C in steam at 120°C [147]. (d) The function of Hv of sample sintered with applied loads [159]. (e) Comparison of various properties mechanical properties of HEC-SiCw with different C content [162]. |
4.3.2 High-entropy Borides
Fig. 9. (a) Crystal structures of different HEBs [167] [170] [171] [172]. (b) Prediction of multiple HEB2 syntheses by DEED: Compared with the results of EFA and VEC, the prediction of DEED was significantly better than the other two [10]. (c) Correlation between hardness, lattice distortion, and Atomic-size difference δ of HEB ceramics [164]. (d) Oxidation depth of twelve samples oxidized at 1673 K for 2h [145]. (e) HEB2-Nd sample's oxide layer consists of a porous-dense-porous-dense four-layer structure; the oxide layer of the HEB2-Cr sample exhibits a distinct layer structure [166]. |
4.3.3 High-entropy Nitrides
Fig. 10. (a) SEM images of surface and cross-sectional morphology of (MoNbTaTiZr)1-xNx coatings under different x; Deposition rates of (MoNbTaTiZr)1-xNx coatings with different RN [177]. (b) Surface micro-hardness of W-Ta-Cr-V-N coatings [176]. (c) Crystal Structures of HEC, HECN, and HEN [174]. (d) Bond populations and density of states for HEN and HECN coatings; Crystal Structures of HEC, HECN, and HEN [179]. (e) The increase in mass per unit area as a function of oxidation time reflects the variation of the surface mass of the sample with time at different oxidation durations [54]. |
4.3.4 Other High-entropy ceramic
Fig. 11. (a) Crystal structure of tetragonal transition metal disilicide (left), hexagonal transition metal disilicides (right) [196]. (b) Reversible phase transitions of HEA and HEH during hydrogen absorption [190]. (c) Crystal structure of HEPO4 monazites [191]. (d) Electrical conductivity of the high-entropy sulfides [192]. (e) A tomogram slices of the HE-MAX phase lattice structure as well as a picture of the crystal structure in the ideal case; Compressive stress-strain curves of the HE-MAX, Nb2AlC, and Ti2AlC at 1473K, insets show the specimens after testing is completed [151]. |
5 Properties and Applications
Table 5. Summary of properties of high-entropy ceramics. |
Categories | Materials | Key Findings | Ref |
---|---|---|---|
Mechanical | (Al1/6Cr1/6Nb1/6TaTi1/3)O2 | elastic modulus (275.24 ± 32.26 GPa) H = 13.58 ± 2.05 GPa | [197] |
HE TM0.8Sc0.2B2 HE TM0.75Sc0.25B2 HE TM0.75Lu0.25B2 | B = 254 GPa G = 237 GPa E = 539GPa ν = 0.983 | [198] | |
(HfMoNbTaTi)C | μ = 0.1 low friction and wear (0.1 and 10 7 mm3/Nm) H = 18.7 GPa | [199] | |
(WTaNbZrTi)C | H = 21.0 GPa KIC = 5.89 MPa·m1/2 | [14] | |
(CeZrLaSmNdY)O2-δ | KIC = 8.07 MPa·m1/2 | [96] | |
((ZrHfCeYEr)(1-x)/5Tix)O2-δ | elastic modulus (205 GPa), H = 14 GPa, RSR = 97.56 % and 83.36 % (After 60 thermal shock cycles at 1200°C and 1500°C) | [200] | |
(TiTaNbZr)C | KIC = 6.93 ± 0.27 MPa·m1/2 flexural strength (541 ± 48 MPa) | [13] | |
Thermal | ((ZrHfCeYEr)(1-x)/5Tix)O2-δ | κ=1.34 W/(m·K) (at 1100°C) | [200] |
Ce1−2x(NdSm)x(VNbTa)1/3O4+δ | ΔR/R0 = 0.23% at 873K for 1000 h | [201] | |
(SrCaLaBa)1-xTiO3±δ (0 < x ≤ 0.125) | ZT = 0.24 lattice thermal conductivity of 2.54 W/(m·K) at 1073 K | [202] | |
-textured (LaSrBaCa)0.85TiO3 | ZT = 0.13 κ= 1.79 W/(m·K) at 1073 K | [203] | |
Zr0.279(Y0.0708Yb0.0302Ta0.0329Nb0.0402)O0.5469 | κ= 1.55 W/(m·K) at 1200 K CTE = 10.6 ~ 10.9 × 10-6K-1 (at 1400℃) | [204] | |
(LaNdSmEuGd)CrO3 | ΔR/R0 = 4.5% following 1000 h of aging | [205] | |
Electircal | Pr0.2Sm0.2Nd0.2Gd0.2La0.2BaCo2O5+δ | maximum power density of 2.03 W/cm2 | [206] |
Ba0.95K0.05Co0.2Zn0.2Ga0.2Zr0.2Y0.2O3−δ | PPD = 1.33 W/cm2 | [207] | |
LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 | Coulombic efficiencies of Li-ion batteries over 99.9% | [208] | |
(MgTiZnCuF)3O4 | Reversible capacity of 504 mA h/g | [209] | |
La0.2Pr0.2Nd0.2Sm0.2Ba0.1Sr0.1Co0.2Fe0.6Ni0.1Cu0.1O3-δ | Electrical conductivity 635.15 S/cm at 800°C | [210] | |
[(Bi,Na)(La,Li)(Ce,K)CaSr]TiO3 | Initial discharge capacity of 125.9 mA h/g | [211] | |
Catalytic | (FeMnCoNiCr)3O4 | PPD = 1.33 W/cm2 at solid oxide fuel cells | [33] |
(TiVCrMo)B2 | FE = 97.9% (at hydrogenation process of NO3-RR) | [212] | |
La2(CoNiMgZnNaLiRuO6 | overpotential of 40.7 mV at 10 mA/cm2 | [21] | |
(FeCoNiCuZn)3O4 | HER (η = 207 mV at 10 mA/cm2) OER (η = 347 mV at 10 mA/cm2) | [20] | |
Ru0.13/Ba0.3Sr0.3Bi0.4(ZrHfTiFe)O3 | 51% CO conversion at 90°C within time of less than 1 s | [49] | |
Magnetic | (CrMnFeCoNi)3O4 | TC > 873 k | [35] |
(MgZnMnCoNiFe)3O4 | ferrimagnetic behavior with a saturation magnetization of 22 emu/g at 2 K and 7.2 emu/g at 300 K | [213] | |
LaCr0.2Mn0.2Fe0.2Al0.2Ga0.2O3 | Magnetic behavior driven by competing interactions among Cr, Mn, and Fe sublattices | [34] | |
(LaNdSmGd)1-xYbxMnO3 | Mr/Ms ≈ 0.42 at 5 K | [56] | |
Dielecttic | SrLa(Al0.50−xGaxZn0.125Mg0.125Ti0.25)O4 | Qf = 98,000 GHz τf = −2.0 ppm/°C | [214] |
(MgCoNiCuZn)O, | Output voltage 525 V of the droplet electricity generator | [215] | |
(1-x)[0.6(Bi0.47Na0.47Yb0.03Tm0.01)TiO3-0.4 (BaSr)TiO3]xSr(ZrHf)O3 | Wrec = 10.46 J/cm3 (at 685 kV/cm) PD = 332.88 MW/cm3 | [216] | |
0.8Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-0.2Sr(ZrSnHfTiNb)O3 | high εr> 2000 at 150°C and low tandδ (< 0.01, 90 - 341°C) | [217] | |
0.91(0.9Ba(Ti0.97Ca0.03)O3-0.1Bi0.55Na0.45 TiO3)-0.09Bi(LiYMgTiTa)O3 | Wrec = 4.89 J/cm3, g = 91.2% | [218] |
H: Hardness, B: Bulk modulus, G: Shear modulus, E: Young’s modulus, ν: Poisson’s ratio, μ: Friction coefficient, KIC: Fracture toughness, RSR: Residual Strength Ratio, ΔR/R0: Relative resistance, κ: Thermal conductivity, ZT: Thermoelectric Figure of Merit, CTE: Coefficient of Thermal Expansion, PPD: Peak power density, σ: Electrical conductivity, FE: Faradaic Efficiency, HER: Hydrogen Evolution Reaction, OER: Oxygen Evolution Reaction, TC: Curie temperature, Mr/Ms: Remanence ratio Qf: Best quality factor, τf: Temperature coefficient of resonant frequency, PD: Polarization Efficiency, εr:relative permittivity, δ: Dielectric loss tangent, Wrec: Recoverable Energy Density. |
5.1 Mechanical Properties
Fig. 12. (a) Residual flexural strength after cyclic thermal shock at 1500℃ [200]. (b) The cross-section morphology of the ((AlCrNbTa)2Ti)O2 coating [197]. (c) (WTaNbZrTi)C before and after the application of pressure t-ZrO2 and m-ZrO2 content changes, and the martensitic phase transition of ZrO2 under pressure schematic diagram, after the application of pressure the content of t-ZrO2 is significantly reduced, and the content of m-ZrO2 is increased accordingly [14]. (d) Comparison of the dependence of ideal tensile strength and nanoindentation hardness on VEC. The inset in A shows the geometric mean of the strain tensile strength recorded along [001] and [99] as a function of VEC [220]. (e) Mapping of nanohardness and elastic modulus in HEA50C [13]. |
5.2 Thermal Properties
Fig. 13. (a) Mechanical property comparisons between dual-phase zirconate/tantalate HECs, 8YSZ, YTaO4, and others [204]. (b) The fabrication process of (YErYbGdLa)2Zr2O7 ceramic aerogel and its thermal insulating properties [52]. (c) Comparison of PF (power factor) and ZT of ceramics with reported high-entropy perovskites at x = 0.10 [202]. (d) Comparison of the ZT in this study with those of previously reported high-entropy perovskites [203]. |
5.3 Electrical Properties
Fig. 14. (a) The rate discharge performance of HEO and HEO@PPy at various current densities; the rate performance of HEO@PPy significantly outperforms that of HEO [224]. (b) Schematic and SEM cross-section of a single cell with (PrSmNdGdLa)BaCo2O5+δ cathode [206]. (c) Capacity retention of batteries utilizing commercial and decimal solvent-based electrolytes; comparison of capacity retention at -60°C for batteries with electrolytes comprising different solvent combinations [225]. (d) In situ XRD measurements of (FeMnCoNiCr)3O4 powder at 600℃ under a CO2-containing atmosphere as a function of time (e) The MLIP energy (left panel) and force (right panel) of minimizing the root mean squared errors (RMSE). The lower-left and upper-right triangles within each square correspond to the training and test errors, respectively [226]. [33]. |
5.4 Catalytic Properties
Fig. 15. (a) Temperature-dependent (ρ-T) electrical resistivity test [20]. (b) Overpotential and the stability durable time of La2(CNMZNL)RuO6 [21].(c) CO production rate versus time [22]. (d) Highly dispersed Pt particles (size range 2-3 nm) on HEO particles (right), and CO2 hydrogenation activity (left) [230]. (e) FE (Field Emission)-SEM images of HEO-CNT and rHEO-CNT surface morphologies [231]. |
5.5 Magnetic Properties
Fig. 16. (a) Magnetic induction strength versus temperature for (a-b) LC, (c-d) LCM, (e-f) LCMF, (g-h) LCMFA, and (i-j) LCMFAG ceramics in ZFC (Zero Field Cooling) and FC (Field Cooling) modes at 100 Oe and 1000 Oe, inset show the χ-1 vs T and the straight line represents the C-W fitting [34]. (b) Hysteresis loops of the prepared HEOs at 300 K. The inset shows the low-field region of the hysteresis loops [122]. (c) Magnetization versus magnetic field curves for the samples at 25°C [131]. |
5.6 Dielectric Properties
Fig. 17. (a): Wrec and η as a function of electric field and Wrec comparison of (SrBaPbLaNa)Nb2O6 with other entropic materials of different configurations [36]. (b) Crystal structures of the R (R3c) and T (P4bm) phases with octahedral tilt; The overall energy storage performance of the obtained dielectric ceramics is compared with other work reported [216]. (c) Comparison of energy density and energy storage efficiency of generative learning screened compositions with pristine matrix Bi(Mg0.5Ti0.5)O3 at different breakdown fields. Comparison of energy densities and breakdown fields between original experimental compositions, screened compositions, and the original matrix Bi(Mg0.5Ti0.5)O3 [234]. |
Fig. 18. An overview diagram of HECs. The outer ring shows the percentage of studies on high-entropy oxides, carbides, nitrides, borides and others. The inner rings show the main applications of HECs, as well as the four core effects of high-entropy materials and a schematic of the disordered structure, respectively. |